tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4670493689479424122024-03-18T07:32:23.189+00:00Architecture and other HabitsPaul Davieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05249946666409755091noreply@blogger.comBlogger957125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467049368947942412.post-37159001848270869022015-07-27T17:10:00.002+01:002015-07-27T17:11:19.174+01:00Re-make Re-model<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhJ5M4T-WOIzk5RBcHhTcpjwDobLIGyIDkUcb3lbxgYPJ_DrkkoRa1lPPPNarfXR9BKaC9OZXEFMOl77uHaCpdnU1nk8CYHJXnXwx6K0gCjWKo7S71jvxE9C8Qi0n2sH-45U36ifSH32znw/s1600/IMG_2741.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhJ5M4T-WOIzk5RBcHhTcpjwDobLIGyIDkUcb3lbxgYPJ_DrkkoRa1lPPPNarfXR9BKaC9OZXEFMOl77uHaCpdnU1nk8CYHJXnXwx6K0gCjWKo7S71jvxE9C8Qi0n2sH-45U36ifSH32znw/s320/IMG_2741.JPG" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
So realising I'm no good at pensions, uninterested in investments, hopeless at insurance, generally doom laden with regard to futures, and unable to deal with so called authority, I go back to something I can do which will actually help. You wouldn't believe how little information was at my disposal to make this scratch model of the gallery scheduled for Julie's retrospective in november. I'm really quite proud of myself that one weekend and thirty years of architectural experience enabled me to put it together, and it hardly stressed me out at all.Paul Davieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05249946666409755091noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467049368947942412.post-33140992694479502672015-07-24T12:45:00.001+01:002015-07-24T15:45:09.307+01:00PensionsI've never really thought about this before. Pensions, or more specifically 'My Pension' has lurked somewhere over there in the shadows. I would prefer not to look, after all, when you are young and propelling yourself best you can through life, a pension is the last thing on your mind, and I'm sure all pension providers are deeply aware of this fact (mores the pity).<br />
So I looked at the figure on the page and winced. Previously, even in full time employment, I would only come across this information when doing my taxes each January, a chore made bearable only because Julie and I do them together at the same time and we usually get some money back. Soon we won't have to make tax returns, so we probably shan't, and we wont get any money back. That's part of George Osborne's cunning plan. Whatever, you look at the figure as if something must be wrong with it, and put it back in the box.<br />
It seems this pensions business is a bit more of a problem than I thought. In most unlikely circumstances I find myself grazing some financial guidance; it has the term 'aging population' leaping from the page. My father was lucky enough to have a final salary pension, which pays out seemingly forever as a percentage of his final wage packet. They put a stop to that as a general policy years ago; what you will get (roughly speaking) is just the interest on what you've put in the pot, and therefore if interest is 1%, you'd need £100,000 to get £1000 per year. So frankly we'll all be poor. Worse, if the markets go tits up we'll all be starving. You might have the where-with-all to invest £100,000 and get 7%, but what have you invested in- probably in the chicanery that got the banks in to trouble in the first place! What to do?<br />
Thankfully Julie is ever ready with an answer: 'Wind farms!- Wave power!' she says.Paul Davieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05249946666409755091noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467049368947942412.post-88396590837224237692015-07-23T19:48:00.003+01:002015-07-23T19:49:57.906+01:00Even the Telegraph worries..<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjIbadwBFl81IzTqdbj9NbFyvwydIghbuo1BYmr-jwSI1piXoRLFYEV_wfrtGMbWWy2paPDRE05lBxbRlWGipDCygUtrSvZgctN2lw-DVTQYFJn3DxgnvJdUXq0OOO5i_bBc1q9vqZttRi9/s1600/FullSizeRender.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="138" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjIbadwBFl81IzTqdbj9NbFyvwydIghbuo1BYmr-jwSI1piXoRLFYEV_wfrtGMbWWy2paPDRE05lBxbRlWGipDCygUtrSvZgctN2lw-DVTQYFJn3DxgnvJdUXq0OOO5i_bBc1q9vqZttRi9/s400/FullSizeRender.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
Cartoon from the Daily Telegraph this week. Please click to enlarge!Paul Davieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05249946666409755091noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467049368947942412.post-60061675098380631762015-07-12T21:52:00.002+01:002015-07-12T21:52:57.508+01:00AvalancheWhen complex systems fail it's probably bad news, so you have to build in other complex systems to accommodate. Human systems are by comparison rather primitive I suppose, but they are still complex, since we respond to such myriad subtle stimuli to work out whether we are in a good situation or not, whether to fight or run. By comparison e-mail as a means of communication is the equivalent of a clump hammer.<br />
People imagine that working is a university is a rather comfortable life; well it probably was and it probably could be, but there are a series of intractables within the management of that complex system within the management of another; the wider economy which have turned universities in to businesses, which are making life harder and harder. It's now a war between a culture of culture and a culture of management.<br />
If we forgot every previous human catastrophe (I wonder at the tone of Hitler or Stalin's e-mails if they'd been able to send them) it would seem to be better to rely on human systems rather than electronic clump hammers, it is certainly the case that if there is a sudden problem in the human system, it has be be worked out with negotiation (simply because we are all so damn difficult/complex), power in electronic systems means that a tiny snow ball very rapidly becomes an avalanche, partly because a series of distant individuals suddenly are made aware of a problem but can't get to the problem and fix it, OR, they all try and do so at the same time, creating confusion and cancelling each other out.<br />
these days, everytime I hear that 'ping' for incoming mail, I quake in my boots. There you have it, in the modern world, you're PARANOID by definition.<br />
<br />Paul Davieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05249946666409755091noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467049368947942412.post-24254770609862094872015-06-19T10:28:00.000+01:002015-06-19T21:58:39.995+01:00The Plan Is (Still) the GeneratorMore often than not architectural students confuse renderings with drawings and pictures with plans. There is no doubt it is a fascination with the laborious nature and potential verisimilitude of computer renderings that diverts attention, and it is completely understandable in the student, but it has become a distraction to the extent that tutors can now find themselves thinking that some projects suffer from over rendering; all the lights on with nobody home. Certain types of rendering seem to drive work in to outer space, and it's now a compliment when conversely, you hardly notice the rendering package at all.<br />
This is the time of year when I have to look at a lot of projects and it's a complex business. When running a design studio, there was always the aura of combat, but now, as more of an observer, I like to think, rather corny though this might sound, that the Sweeney has finally made the shift to Morse. I can enjoy it a good deal more for sure, as well as being able to leave the fray after a reasonable time and the others to carry on slugging it out as they invariably do (even though you wont find me returning home to listen to Wagner).<br />
The plan, over these agonising assessments, still strikes me as the generator. Excessive rendering distracts from the plan, and good planning is still the essence of a good project in every sense. There are other architectural components too; the distribution of structure, the integration of servicing and fabric, use of precedent and so on and guess what; these are all compromised by rendering as well! Whilst I have pondered for many years the possibility that these things don't matter anymore (Las Vegas casinos come to mind) now the bloody things have come back to haunt me. Even this I can put down to my desire to find an alternative to the dreary formalism the computer has brought to that other area, shape making and fabrication- because I don't draw on a computer!<br />
It is also a myth that computers bring accuracy and accuracy is the be all and end all. Well if you are building a space station it will be, but while we still have building sites here on earth, while we still use wheelbarrows and boots sink in mud, it certainly isn't. It is extraordinary how we, so called intelligent men and women piloting the course of architectural development, have collectively extinguished such considerations from our appreciation of the architectural project. Perhaps this is because we have been too busy fighting with each other. In the process we have perhaps been as destructive as the multinationals destroying the rainforests.<br />
I think back to those boffins who were inventing CAD whilst I was an undergraduate at Bristol University in the eighties and realise some things don't change; I didn't trust them then and I don't trust them now.Paul Davieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05249946666409755091noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467049368947942412.post-26537259483467622962015-06-18T20:34:00.002+01:002015-06-18T20:39:31.997+01:00Our Trike<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjUXsShY88x5Zk1zA40UNc65VvDX_5pWRsEDhcqxpF5gAp2qtpyv_XexJY95fnfAOxR8dupUiyat9IZJF1dQ2xiAjfjumyHvtQmnSeS6GZpC8K4KTte4YYekyZxoKJaV9Y2uAxVI9mWbI4-/s1600/IMG_2712.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="298" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjUXsShY88x5Zk1zA40UNc65VvDX_5pWRsEDhcqxpF5gAp2qtpyv_XexJY95fnfAOxR8dupUiyat9IZJF1dQ2xiAjfjumyHvtQmnSeS6GZpC8K4KTte4YYekyZxoKJaV9Y2uAxVI9mWbI4-/s400/IMG_2712.JPG" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
It's not finished yet (this is just the bare mating of bike with car) but it is wonderfully not a heap of parts in the back of a garage. Craftsmanship, thank god it still exists.Paul Davieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05249946666409755091noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467049368947942412.post-42214766902397616922015-06-06T19:03:00.002+01:002015-06-06T19:04:17.508+01:00Robert Crumb<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi7H7XSZP54LImF-Fh_y4zrzP3lX3jtZeRi3MS7CKihDSA-TehQGZnRql-Grsa0ecrMoUinJWlbz73js9F1g3y1zPa154DoRajkbajrsWQWzzIot3PZBp7I72iT7p1VjKr-6Po69vWHWbYI/s1600/Devil+Girl.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi7H7XSZP54LImF-Fh_y4zrzP3lX3jtZeRi3MS7CKihDSA-TehQGZnRql-Grsa0ecrMoUinJWlbz73js9F1g3y1zPa154DoRajkbajrsWQWzzIot3PZBp7I72iT7p1VjKr-6Po69vWHWbYI/s400/Devil+Girl.jpg" width="296" /></a></div>
<br />Paul Davieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05249946666409755091noreply@blogger.com8tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467049368947942412.post-69878824711199104512015-06-05T14:19:00.001+01:002015-06-05T14:20:54.015+01:00Immoderate Greatness<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgiWodA5sCJ-aVYHfykuk2SvL6J4Yf-BcB6mgP6gQh4XDNNWKUpk9h3YmLTWxx6AfB3CU529k6UI6wNiNJmQhEUZWgSzZgyGoNjz4xix1ZznFBOX4t8KBoz0nfHor0hS2xCd428WgVfhqLC/s1600/Ophuls.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgiWodA5sCJ-aVYHfykuk2SvL6J4Yf-BcB6mgP6gQh4XDNNWKUpk9h3YmLTWxx6AfB3CU529k6UI6wNiNJmQhEUZWgSzZgyGoNjz4xix1ZznFBOX4t8KBoz0nfHor0hS2xCd428WgVfhqLC/s320/Ophuls.png" width="205" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
If you want to cheer yourself up read this book, no I'm not joking; you will laugh your way through the afternoon in sure knowledge we are all doomed. For me those lovely flowers in the previous post suddenly became, as they turn gracefully white, melancholic talismans of our inner and irredeemable tragedy. And when I went out to get the perfect modest lunch (a shish kebab) I felt a certain euphoria as I passed all the ladies with their push-chairs outside nostalgia orientated cafe's. It really is quite wonderful to know that the second law of thermodynamics is so stacked against us that it could be rack and ruin any day now. As Ophus quotes (on page 40): '...empires behave like all complex adaptive systems. They function in apparent equilibrium for some unknowable period. And then, quite abruptly, they collapse...(T)he shift from consummation to destruction and then to desolation is not cyclical.It is sudden.'<br />
Am I running to the whisky bottle? Well I'd be excused I suppose, but no, I'm running instead to a practice seminar on the late work of the great Corbu, and I can feel nothing but energy for it.Paul Davieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05249946666409755091noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467049368947942412.post-67382781961611342482015-06-04T21:13:00.001+01:002015-06-04T21:14:31.466+01:00Life at Home<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjfx_qTx9g5VqVrBlbU65M-06U-tr4lmbnjwClGweI0mTDXgUh_AOznqQyFHl87FdE7BQOAYud9Mah6o7s3ZWa6eld6YTP4YO2Awhosz0E9Mv1Iy0H2hJm95yIt36KWhtQccMgucQlEBfqt/s1600/Life+at+home.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="298" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjfx_qTx9g5VqVrBlbU65M-06U-tr4lmbnjwClGweI0mTDXgUh_AOznqQyFHl87FdE7BQOAYud9Mah6o7s3ZWa6eld6YTP4YO2Awhosz0E9Mv1Iy0H2hJm95yIt36KWhtQccMgucQlEBfqt/s400/Life+at+home.JPG" width="400" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
A friend suggested this was 'a bit David Lynch' on Facebook, but hell, nice peonies!</div>
<br />Paul Davieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05249946666409755091noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467049368947942412.post-47264215471960433082015-06-03T12:05:00.001+01:002015-06-03T12:05:32.712+01:00The Carnival Club Soho<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg93VHv2WyJtoT-rYhLjC7FAyKNy3V25d0mf7u7fITFH6CG_5AHi_hBFmrRHxRK17AuoJQKetWK8pTy14BIY7J4p9xhqTSNs3N2DhDpVPU1b7cnY4aME94-W775bHc9zP1zuwqVOGhYm8KA/s1600/Carvival+2.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="217" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg93VHv2WyJtoT-rYhLjC7FAyKNy3V25d0mf7u7fITFH6CG_5AHi_hBFmrRHxRK17AuoJQKetWK8pTy14BIY7J4p9xhqTSNs3N2DhDpVPU1b7cnY4aME94-W775bHc9zP1zuwqVOGhYm8KA/s320/Carvival+2.jpeg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
When you go looking for pictures of old Soho they come amazingly pejorative. Scanning through Getty Images I was struck by pictures of young men buying knives and another showing a street scene with a caption 'prowling the streets...'. It was like something out of Winogrand or Weegee. Lots of us are nostalgic for old Soho, whichever old Soho befits your generation of course, but I don't remember it like that at all. By the eighties perhaps only Chief Constable James Anderton (the Manchester cop whose anti-sleaze campaign famously netted the Sun's <i>Page Three Annual</i> ) might have described me as 'a prowler'. For instance when I first arrived in London I discovered my History and Theory lecturer worked in a sex shop and I was soon friends with a girl from Newcastle, a barmaid in the Intrepid Fox, who found life better in a clip joint. Neither were at all 'menacing'. And when I think about it further, a rather large percentage of my friends might respond to this surreptitiously taken image (not taken by me) and at least twenty years old, which passed in to my no doubt (in the archaic Anderton's language) 'sweaty' hand yesterday. It was taken inside a tiny but somehow secure cavern; the long lost Carnival strip joint which sat just along from the Pollo Bar on Old Compton Street, and the reason we might smile is that we shared (independently of course) many pleasurable afternoons there.<br />
It was a most peculiar not to say fascinating place. For instance, the (I assume regular) clientele made a great fuss of distributing chocolates on to the stage. There must be a very complex psychology behind wanting to do this, but I certainly wouldn't call whatever that mechanism was 'prowling'.<br />
Even further, remembering Michel Foucault's adventures in San Fransciso or discovering that Professor Richard Feynman, world changing quantum phsysicist, declared his topless local his 'office away from the office', and affirmed in court it was 'a public need' really makes us think about the way we describe things and what it means.<br />
My next beef will of course be on the subject of 'hard working families'.Paul Davieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05249946666409755091noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467049368947942412.post-61817497514387999142015-05-30T19:24:00.001+01:002015-05-30T19:24:34.947+01:00Our Summer Look<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh1Ei0-P03IrZB_fqhl0r2PJhI4vKhZy5CSx1CVVVcqCl364sUoVHQk1dnAdhIsn583SerT_8WWPWL0cuEX4NjSi9oJSe3uatjHmS_VHoWo4myAr-kJ9pnQ5qCUkgpFIosuGio_PKW8gs6V/s1600/IMG_2687.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="298" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh1Ei0-P03IrZB_fqhl0r2PJhI4vKhZy5CSx1CVVVcqCl364sUoVHQk1dnAdhIsn583SerT_8WWPWL0cuEX4NjSi9oJSe3uatjHmS_VHoWo4myAr-kJ9pnQ5qCUkgpFIosuGio_PKW8gs6V/s400/IMG_2687.JPG" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />Paul Davieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05249946666409755091noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467049368947942412.post-91043731981205843762015-05-27T15:03:00.002+01:002015-05-27T18:55:24.512+01:00My Research Strategy<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh5HlDn8czM9tjILpJhGARKX1PaUjmUoOSfBaXzTapRoD09ZvzynqZzpOnJOUkTQ9KzgP5DUiAeHVsOx2Dwpaha-5ubCdDU0Wh0SqRQEbHjxhe8ew8GsglEazaRulWaJiBS9gaScSOovGWr/s1600/Paul+at+Chand.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="215" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh5HlDn8czM9tjILpJhGARKX1PaUjmUoOSfBaXzTapRoD09ZvzynqZzpOnJOUkTQ9KzgP5DUiAeHVsOx2Dwpaha-5ubCdDU0Wh0SqRQEbHjxhe8ew8GsglEazaRulWaJiBS9gaScSOovGWr/s320/Paul+at+Chand.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
Always going backwards that's me, always back to the old (modern) favourites. Therefore I've realised, and not before bloody time, that this IS my research: I am probably doomed to recapitulate the same stuff over and over but slightly differently (and in slightly different media) forever, and when I finally get to build a house for us, I shall discorporate with the effort (see below post). Oh well, if the ideas are worthwhile that can't be a bad thing, even if they are now rather out of favour. Mankind doesn't change that much no matter how much it thinks it might. So, there you have it: when you read my research proposal it's basically; the history of good ideas in architecture that weren't (but are).<br />
How did I discover this was what I was doing? Well I came across a lovely piece on Chandigarh by Peter Davey. This seemed such an unlikely conjugation I flattered myself in finding it. It's charm came from the circumstances; Peter being in Chandigarh and clearly wanting to be polite to the many Indian notaries who understood Corbu's snakes, turtles, cows, donkeys and meandering fish, and 'got' how it was all put together whilst he was madly sceptical about the ensemble himself, so Davey had to prove himself most adept at betraying his own prejudices (that L-C was beastly and impervious (amongst other things) to drips) in their midst; and he was very good at it; a tribute to his own non beastliness in fact. It was full of, 'well perhaps and perhaps not' stuff.<br />
Indeed we have to ask ourselves how exactly do those capitol buildings (above) relate to the sacred Himalayas that are actually so far away in the distance, but perhaps I ALSO now have to revisit Davey himself. Being somebody who had a go at him long ago for managing a boring organ like the Architectural Review for so long, now I feel a twinge of revision. To my friends<i> at</i> the AR he's almost mythological, and now not so well, so I have all grounds to change my mind. And anybody, anybody who took six pints to interview somebody over lunch should really get the benefit of the doubt in these sad (coffee orientated) days.<br />
Once again, we are forced to change our minds. Similarly I've just read a rather good dissertation outlining how we are all going to hell in a handbag with regard to city food supply. The answer, to all who bother to look, and once more NOT changing one's mind about good ideas, is probably a Radiant one. Let Starbucks stick that up their Unite d'habitation.Paul Davieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05249946666409755091noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467049368947942412.post-41172213893785880832015-05-21T13:30:00.000+01:002015-05-22T12:20:17.754+01:00Donald Wilson RIP<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgIryxHxUa1jsUttSHMPmOlD-2yKcSfhSmX8t0jNebotq2qRwFPQq6R20ck42piccJHkUerU8eGcS2RBULXt4MrSqRet0AkAlSf8x3cCL23OZ-J6QSnSp338Vy37OO3HKL8m5_mzF57BiyF/s1600/safe_image.php.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgIryxHxUa1jsUttSHMPmOlD-2yKcSfhSmX8t0jNebotq2qRwFPQq6R20ck42piccJHkUerU8eGcS2RBULXt4MrSqRet0AkAlSf8x3cCL23OZ-J6QSnSp338Vy37OO3HKL8m5_mzF57BiyF/s320/safe_image.php.jpeg" width="213" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
About a year or so ago I found myself sitting here thinking about Donald and how he was. I even left a message on the phone of the pub next to where he and Ann lived in Sydling St Nicholas in Dorset, at least lived there in 1982, when I went and worked for him on his building site. His obituary appeared before me last night, in the RIBA Journal, when I was once more scanning for information, since his name had cropped up in a book I was browsing on Aldington Craig and Collinge, the much respected practice that Don went to work for when life as an architect/builder got too much.<br />
Life as an architect builder was indeed horrific, and I still have vivid memories of sitting in that pub after a days building with Jackie Hall, Ann's extremely attractive daughter, both exhausted and bemoaning the state of our aching limbs and our (separate) love lives.<br />
I'd first met Don via his son Martin, who was at school with me, and his sisters (one of whom married the PE teacher) and Ann who was the school administrator. Don lived in a converted cottage with his first wife, hanging furniture and <i>Free</i> records, with a workshop where Martin and I would attempt to unseize at least one moped engine. The memories, as I said, are quite vivid, for it was my first encounter with the life of an architect with a hanging cane chair and bright cushions.<br />
That life was clearly not a bed of roses, but Don, when not exasperated, had an excellent sense of humour and infectious personality. He was even a bit of a celebrity having done 'The House of the Future' for Granada TV. He was, in short, as exotic as you are likely to get in Wilmslow, Cheshire, pre-tabloid celeb. Since my dad was encouraging me to study architecture he took an interest in Donald's gangly influence too, driving me over there whenever the workshop beckoned. I suppose what I'm telling you here is that Don is responsible for all this, all this life in architecture, as I sit completing to proofs of 'History of Architecture Retold', I think of him, even to the point of feeling a bit emotional about it.<br />
Later Don took a keen interest in how I was getting on, he took me around the now demolished Mechanised Letter Office in Hemel Hempstead where he was project architect, laughing at the fact that the supposed breton brut concrete had been condemned six times, and introduced me to Peter Aldington, that lovely man with the beard, in the office at Turn End. I went over to Bath University to hear a lecture by Peter Smithson, that rather odd man in a funny tie, and sat with Don in his office. By then he'd been rescued, thankfully, by academia. Then I guess I went off on my own way, and I had no further thought, excepting the occasional Christmas card, until that moment last year. Funny how things catch up with you.<br />
When I think of what Don stood for; understanding building inside out from first principles; making his own windows, kitchens, HiFi speakers, I get some horrible perspective on where it all went horribly wrong. It would be inconceivable to teach such stuff now, much the pity. Of course when Don went out to practice what he preached, he taught us a valuable lesson, that craft hardly forestalls economics, and you are in for a good deal of pain. But he did it, nothing could stop him, and that's admirable. Indeed, he demonstrated something rather more than that, a trait that lies at the heart of all the great architects (and perhaps the value of the architectural world in general) that in some way they seem more attenuated to life's possibilities and tragedies. They bring life alive in built form.<br />
Cheers Donald, and that's what I was going to say; a big thankyou.<br />
<br />Paul Davieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05249946666409755091noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467049368947942412.post-35118592107726662862015-05-16T11:26:00.003+01:002015-05-16T11:26:59.268+01:00Pumping Iron<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj4nAmKlPdF18m_OpXYr3AujVCpj8sfDcxMQjB2QursMpbBevP_5TCMguPaxVKQ1HJQ2LcMIrDojmQy0UWMaa2BmYNG1CV5fqjI43a-Cib0NpZORDHsSySrrkmWWQoviavaA60YyehJDgWC/s1600/IMG_2673.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj4nAmKlPdF18m_OpXYr3AujVCpj8sfDcxMQjB2QursMpbBevP_5TCMguPaxVKQ1HJQ2LcMIrDojmQy0UWMaa2BmYNG1CV5fqjI43a-Cib0NpZORDHsSySrrkmWWQoviavaA60YyehJDgWC/s320/IMG_2673.JPG" width="239" /></a></div>
<br />Paul Davieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05249946666409755091noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467049368947942412.post-32519293115720705612015-05-14T18:41:00.001+01:002015-05-15T09:46:54.201+01:00DissentIt was remarkable how quickly the ripples of dissent over last weeks election result abated. Within one day, one of my Facebook friends was commenting that the 'dust had settled', several others were clearly exasperated by my continual re-posting of provocative posts and were in the mood to get on with 'business as usual'. I found myself getting physically sick. I've noticed this before; it is clearly my psychological defence mechanism, and I have only just recovered from this latest bout to sit here and face the music.<br />
Social media has been careful to build in dissent as an impossibility, but aren't grumpiness and dissent necessarily to be accommodated, even enjoyed? The alternative is to live in some kind of Disneyland, which, strangely, is what my local, lovingly previously referred to in this blog as The Trench of Despair turned in to this weekend. It was unfortunate the election coincided with the VE day celebrations; the place was suddenly playing forties tunes and festooned with bunting. The management even wanted staff to wear fancy dress. The ensemble looked like a UKIP after party. Nigel Farage might as well have been booked for lunch. This, within one of our more spectacular representations of 'defurbishment', ultrashabby chic, or junk shop austerity (why people like this look I have no idea, to my mind it's rather an import from Eastern Europe post 1989, when the cool bars in the old east were old fruit and vegetable shops, until the tactic caught on in Shoreditch).<br />
Talking of the Soviet era, I heard nothing of allied rather then British victory; saw no red flags, heard no Red Army Choir, no recognition that victory over the Nazis was originally an overwhelmingly Soviet affair.<br />
Perhaps we have become witless too, as well as Tory, but it all fits, since the reason swathes of people voted conservative at the last minute was fear, fear of jobs, mortgages and debt. It represented the crudest survival of the fittest mechanism; save yourselves! So expect more of Disneyland, for it represents an architecture of re-assurance; it's cause and effect.<br />
<br />
<br />Paul Davieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05249946666409755091noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467049368947942412.post-31113820883642486292015-05-08T15:22:00.003+01:002015-05-08T15:23:18.057+01:00The Day After<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgrU3NvFYIqH2XTWn9cckmR4oC8BKgUFDbaWdmWUgAP2jsS4eF2m5LniIG6ppHH2L928SCu5GGrBN2I62C873mgXURDCDIBSZMkiVNA6FJCGrjURPT6Rp31cbnodgnPa4ZgCEA2NHMP-YvS/s1600/IMG_2672.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="278" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgrU3NvFYIqH2XTWn9cckmR4oC8BKgUFDbaWdmWUgAP2jsS4eF2m5LniIG6ppHH2L928SCu5GGrBN2I62C873mgXURDCDIBSZMkiVNA6FJCGrjURPT6Rp31cbnodgnPa4ZgCEA2NHMP-YvS/s400/IMG_2672.JPG" width="400" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
The day after the election, a Tory majority, and this is what you get.</div>
<br />Paul Davieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05249946666409755091noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467049368947942412.post-87951484019423942342015-05-05T21:34:00.001+01:002015-05-05T22:03:13.438+01:00The Modernist Approach to Planning<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiffI_88hFbUhxOD6fpZKZUZ1GmIoffp-sflrpL0ohJptuQ4Y4YRUnTlIqtXYtihkfwe17CWuzJ2SN2Np_FO5BbyegEnR0ezuB23FMar526nOxvdfxOg2GoHRJXdjv8CKKXPpYUxi6mUuyA/s1600/tumblr_nabgutrwXa1rbnlmvo2_500.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiffI_88hFbUhxOD6fpZKZUZ1GmIoffp-sflrpL0ohJptuQ4Y4YRUnTlIqtXYtihkfwe17CWuzJ2SN2Np_FO5BbyegEnR0ezuB23FMar526nOxvdfxOg2GoHRJXdjv8CKKXPpYUxi6mUuyA/s1600/tumblr_nabgutrwXa1rbnlmvo2_500.jpg" height="230" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
With university departments having to cut across the board, it was interesting to think today, just like Le Corbusier seventy five years ago, that modernism was simply more economical. These days architecture students have to flounder around in search of any old 'idea' which nine times out of ten turns out to be a bad one, in search of their beloved project. Give them a good dose of modernist pragmatism and all this shit would go by the wayside; you'd note that the student had either manipulated the system well, or not, and not have to ponder the myriad of versions of creativity they blindly offer with regard to 'materiality', 'floating crisp packets in the air', 'moustaches' or the significance to planning of the 'Black Exodus' all which could largely be seen as a waste of time. This of course would also cut teaching hours by at least 3/4.<br />
We really are missing a point here.Paul Davieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05249946666409755091noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467049368947942412.post-28518607248281900132015-05-01T05:19:00.001+01:002015-05-01T10:27:12.020+01:00OverthinkingOne of the great tells of late capitalist economics becomes clear when we (or it ) turn our attention to education, where as a central imperative, it has to offer less and less for more and more.<br />
There are so many paradoxes; the more western society advances, the less profit is made; and so the more 'education' has to be orientated to 'innovation' and latterly 'entrepreneurship' to prop up it up. What's more, the more education theoretically critiques the system itself, the more it is ineffectual as an agent of criticism (see higher education in the USA and UK).<br />
The subject you are studying is no longer the point, at least not it's bare bones (take note all architectural students at the Bartlett or AA); as to the essential principles (long discarded as 'uninteresting' or paradoxically temporal), it is only 'innovation' in the area that is interesting to the machine. This is now couched as 'research'. If the 'research' is counterproductive to the system, it seems not to matter that much, it is still product (ineffectual), hence the volume of critical product increases (so supporting the system, or rather educational superstructure). You could call this over-thinking since any real problem has been left way behind.<br />
Even if you are not in the slightest way interested in the processes of growth you might soon realise that as a student you are paying for a product that is busy anticipating it's own demise; that is, you are no longer learning about your subject, you are learning about capital's interest in your subject, and paying for it.<br />
This is why Catch 22 is such a great book.Paul Davieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05249946666409755091noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467049368947942412.post-80094484532227284372015-04-29T16:57:00.003+01:002015-04-30T10:56:48.978+01:00Bodie and Doyle<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEig3izagi1QfUWUTvW7nf5BC9mnMDpyjg5h2QJnmsKB860NlyXqhSnC8R4R9nSqTdOnY1Pu9nVi8JBiZ9CGCKAWs-FMNNr2rmZgfgKVLRxtucWUn8G7dwtFU9f0Pnc2Krkev5iIUfJxyHKH/s1600/Ah0eUKRUMlnZHzw-300x300.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEig3izagi1QfUWUTvW7nf5BC9mnMDpyjg5h2QJnmsKB860NlyXqhSnC8R4R9nSqTdOnY1Pu9nVi8JBiZ9CGCKAWs-FMNNr2rmZgfgKVLRxtucWUn8G7dwtFU9f0Pnc2Krkev5iIUfJxyHKH/s1600/Ah0eUKRUMlnZHzw-300x300.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
Looking through this blog it's clear that I seem to like things that repeat themselves, that do variations on a theme. This might include records by The Cult or ACDC, watching films like Where Eagles Dare an inordinate number of times, or watching strippers in the White Horse and probably extends to my enjoyment of Mies van de Rohe and the tease that I find fascinating in the eminently thematic Le Corbusier. It is clear I am relatively unimaginative in this way, I like the fact that all Harley Davidsons are variations on a theme, and that none of them are dependent so much on ideas, but stand as variations, and that the idea is variation in itself. This is also why I can hardly bring myself, as we crawl to the end of year, to find myself in such proximity to so much rather frivolous creativity in terms of student design work. Unless I can see the links to something else, I'm lost. Watching somebody else's gratuitous creativity bores me to tears.<br />
With this in mind I have renewed enthusiasm for the re-runs of The Professionals at 5pm on ITV4.<br />
The villains are always involved in dastedly plots to destabilise good old Blighty, their molls are always heroin or coke addled posh girls, Body and Doyle always disobey orders, Gordon Jackson always reaches for the whisky bottle and that's about it. However, this time around I do note that originally they chased around in cars by British Leyland across deserted industrial sites, while the enemy drove Fords, but reliablility issues dogged filming schedules and they all ended up in Ford Capris: a startling visualization of Britain's industrial decline.Paul Davieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05249946666409755091noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467049368947942412.post-61496067920055318492015-04-24T12:00:00.003+01:002015-04-24T12:00:31.156+01:00Architectural History Retold<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhek67KgggEZEfTVn-DBS4vIHS4g_WO-br7VYtKAFl_t41Hdd_DHu7noLj1zwtqptItlD5qfDvpdOGPLX_3ufeyGrBMl-MXvLm_awVZiq8YzypQMBlGjYLuvznogW3PblPpMFt5ETxcusC8/s1600/the_future_final_low.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhek67KgggEZEfTVn-DBS4vIHS4g_WO-br7VYtKAFl_t41Hdd_DHu7noLj1zwtqptItlD5qfDvpdOGPLX_3ufeyGrBMl-MXvLm_awVZiq8YzypQMBlGjYLuvznogW3PblPpMFt5ETxcusC8/s1600/the_future_final_low.jpg" height="320" width="204" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
This will be published in September</div>
<br />Paul Davieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05249946666409755091noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467049368947942412.post-30251177459419076752015-04-23T11:15:00.000+01:002015-04-23T11:24:09.791+01:00The Death Metalist Next DoorIn the Versailles of Louis XIV there must have been somebody who said, somewhat conspiratorially to his friend, 'You know this can't go on, this is all going to go really tits-up'. That is, if the French have or had an expression for 'tits up'. There must have been someone in the court of Phillip II in Madrid who muttered 'Christ! What are we going to do with all this gold? It's a huge deflationary time bomb!' That is if they had an inkling what deflation might be.<br />
I feel the same way about the City of London, now virtually knocking on my front door (see previous post) so I was delighted last night to find I have true agents of the apocalypse living next door, and nicer bunch of fellas it would be hard to meet. If this got out of it might ruin their image, I don't think death metal bands would even subscribe to likes on Facebook, but I promise no evidence of satanic ritual have reached my ears; no bats, no strange deathly aromas, not even a bit of moodiness in the air. I hear only light hearted chuckles. There has been no grunting or thrashing at all, and I now find myself rather embarrassed that I might have played, over loud, Black Sabbath's 13, and raised no more than an eyebrow, and certainly not a scythe, in next door's spotless living room. Neither have been no troops of groupies passing my kitchen window with streaming black make-up. In fact, our only crossed paths come when I knock on the door to pass on a parcel or two, to be greeted by a charming man wearing a Moonmadness tee shirt. Now I did remark, with insouciance, that way back I had seen Camel on their Moonmadness tour, but I wouldn't have if I'd known I was talking to an agent of death.<br />
He protested we wouldn't like their album, Julie saying I'd play it when she's gone to bed. I did, I liked it a lot, scary yes, but good. But from now on, when I pass on those parcels, I'll make sure it's not in the morning.Paul Davieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05249946666409755091noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467049368947942412.post-34701608385101475342015-04-22T11:20:00.002+01:002015-04-22T11:28:37.035+01:00Urban Design is a Waste of Time<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjpSgsmAYtLsDexKftETuuq7wOaq9GmsgKKDEYa8lZxnCcpOBYtRWhrp8Rl9V2uGm23gdrCQs4oFeS5m-Zti05VdU2vfZj3fY4ySPby-z3Z0RzsowtIPsLf1xuHyPGINa6PiYZQgj1XUP45/s1600/800px-Paternoster_Square,_London.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjpSgsmAYtLsDexKftETuuq7wOaq9GmsgKKDEYa8lZxnCcpOBYtRWhrp8Rl9V2uGm23gdrCQs4oFeS5m-Zti05VdU2vfZj3fY4ySPby-z3Z0RzsowtIPsLf1xuHyPGINa6PiYZQgj1XUP45/s1600/800px-Paternoster_Square,_London.jpg" height="213" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
This somewhat provocative statement came to me yesterday as I sat through a thoroughly arresting evening seminar on research in to micro climates around tall buildings, which now largely seems to focus on how to get at least a beam or two of natural light down on to your cappuccino. Clearly this is a case of tail wagging the dog.<br />
Indeed, the tangible products of a gamut of urban design initiatives over the last forty years seems tiny, I can think of one in the London metropolis, Paternoster Square, and that under Royal patronage. The rest of the city just dances to the music of cash tills. Such is the way of the late capitalist metropolis, everything is reduced to money; any fool can see that, so it must be just dim wits or dreamers who insist on so called 'Urban Design' and thrill to the provision of tiny ice rinks surrounded by champagne bars. In this context my view that the most significant piece of 'urban design' of the last half century is Forum Shopping in Caesars Las Vegas looks a pretty salient one. Even it probably has an ice rink to accompany it's many champagne bars by now.<br />
In 1962 even the progenitor of Paternoster Square, who I would gently suggest might be Colin Rowe, decided that because his students were simply not up to the intense formal manipulations involved in the design of actual buildings they might be better off doing urban design, and they kept doing it until he retired in 1990. To think that of students at Cornell in 1962 is rather salutary. What has been the effect of those students on the American city, huh? One look at Denver or Houston would have you claiming your tuition fees back.<br />
Actually I'm being a little mean on that presentation yesterday, since it's political message was strong: when the city of London extends itself on to Bishopsgate Goods Yard with umpteen gleaming, empty, twenty story plus skyscrapers, the shadows will be cast as far north as Arnold Circus, a picturesque, but poverty stricken enclave, so throwing the already poor in to further darkness and debt. And what can we do about it? Precisely nothing, because it would threaten the god of Moloch, 'Job'. These days I suspect even energy efficiency is offset, not unlike pension funds, globally.<br />
All this makes Prince Charles look pretty good; Royalty looking at least better than corporations (councils having been rendered totally ineffective) when it comes to running the planet, being relatively parochial and genuinely concerned for the land beneath one's feet, the green and pleasant, and so on. How can I possibly be saying this?Paul Davieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05249946666409755091noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467049368947942412.post-53017054625222628132015-04-17T12:32:00.002+01:002015-04-17T12:33:42.912+01:00Whisky Sours<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjJg2hu4gI95GpqlmGLBtfCwNvJSBCsV741FEur92dt-2nsctbkREZNO_gIY2XGTN-da2d7Yz6LrPQ-fHGvUaYLbNon7czlmud698wt7uLVZfccAmMlclzURaFIUEHrpwku1IJq-MXkRT7g/s1600/HOB.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjJg2hu4gI95GpqlmGLBtfCwNvJSBCsV741FEur92dt-2nsctbkREZNO_gIY2XGTN-da2d7Yz6LrPQ-fHGvUaYLbNon7czlmud698wt7uLVZfccAmMlclzURaFIUEHrpwku1IJq-MXkRT7g/s1600/HOB.jpg" height="215" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
Like many people I have to watch what I'm drinking, usually in horror and with a certain resolve to walk a mile or two the next day and drink a bottle of Badoit. The problem of course is that I, we, and they (rare guests) all enjoy drinking way beyond governmental guidelines, and I imagine most of government enjoys it too. Historical precedent doesn't help either, imagining Mies with his two lunchtime martinis can easily push you off the rails, and only remembering that Ian Fleming died at fifty six might get you back on them again.<br />
But I have realised one thing, staring at the depleted whisky bottle this morning but feeling decidedly perky, that it must be the mix of lemon juice and sugar added to the sour that mitigates against a hangover. Given the qualities involved, I should have been on the floor (still in bed), but some remarkable chemical reaction has conspired to keep me on my feet and functional. This is a good thing to know.<br />
Other tips include tequila when feeling a little low. That was something I learnt from Las Vegas. Of course the splendid margarita also involves the lemon. And afterwards, the next morning, lemon juice with honey nicely chilled. This could be the secret to a happy life.Paul Davieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05249946666409755091noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467049368947942412.post-35276166599486674892015-04-15T17:49:00.000+01:002015-04-15T17:49:46.961+01:00Blue Streak, Polaris, Trident, Whatever..<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEinGri4kwNXKShVIPQFhkRh3pI0Pl-GpCiDpN435Hg5kakk5LnYUHLyEvWPZI8OOMpmzZYDodFGxlNwMvD9S94-fASTErSTP3PNeAXAfK3ggABsRPa0F1zRhKlRkrTXMsKa0RMBGaBmsAR1/s1600/Hydrogen-Bomb-B.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEinGri4kwNXKShVIPQFhkRh3pI0Pl-GpCiDpN435Hg5kakk5LnYUHLyEvWPZI8OOMpmzZYDodFGxlNwMvD9S94-fASTErSTP3PNeAXAfK3ggABsRPa0F1zRhKlRkrTXMsKa0RMBGaBmsAR1/s1600/Hydrogen-Bomb-B.jpg" height="189" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
Blue Streak, Polaris, Trident whatever you want to call it, Britain's so called independent nuclear deterrent is a very peculiar thing. All of my life I've lived in the shadow of nuclear destruction. Amazingly it hasn't happened. That we are alive at all is not down to precautionary steps either, there's no fall out shelter in this basement (actually no basement). This is not Switzerland or for that matter France, which built many deep car parks for the purpose. Given the warning sirens, we British might as well have put hankies over our heads. Excepting the Queen, who may still have a special little train somewhere, and some civil servants who might scoot down a hole in Wiltshire, we'll all be dead.<br />
It's probably not down to people not wanting to kill me either, it's just threatening nuclear strike comes over as a bit naff, all that posturing so passe, it's not political leaders that will press the button, it's just an accident waiting to happen. I'm not sure even the military want them, they strike me as rather unreliable as a military option.<br />
In the eighties CND was right at the heart of things, now we seem peculiarly attached to those nukes. They appear to represent British jobs. Predictably UKIP want to increase military spending and put ex-soldiers in the police, a most peculiar thing; it's all getting a bit Siegfried and Maginot Line; always ready for the previous war.<br />
To have nukes for prestige? What a thing! To show the world in the aftermath of WW2 the Brits could still do cutting edge; making weapons of mass destruction which would trickle down to better frying pans; embark on a scientific quest of such unimaginable complexity, cost and moral bankruptcy in order to get a better Electrolux? Tragic. I'm reading a very funny (and furious) book by Simon Winder called '<i>The Man Who Saved Britain</i>' about James Bond; he puts the madness in to context very nicely.<br />
Of course one or more of these things is going to go off sooner or later, and I would tentatively suggest that we plan for that not by building more of them, but by getting rid of them. Meanwhile the new wars are clearly informational, porn-bombs and pictures of cats on social media laying waste to whole generations.Paul Davieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05249946666409755091noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-467049368947942412.post-61788870688503567672015-04-08T11:22:00.001+01:002015-04-13T19:58:24.662+01:00The Bauhaus vs Pavilion Suisse<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi6JJtknvl1ygCoabNl0FWdw3N04lirKaw6b_iiBzcOCY5eoMTr7sv7JyTfgLNhYbBwZvgqE3hQHt1k9JcnQCLH95KstpwceScGlKb1I7lY8Y7g79ldxuWitl2iGb8QxhyYka6bIjwT_CZu/s1600/Bauhaus+elevation.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi6JJtknvl1ygCoabNl0FWdw3N04lirKaw6b_iiBzcOCY5eoMTr7sv7JyTfgLNhYbBwZvgqE3hQHt1k9JcnQCLH95KstpwceScGlKb1I7lY8Y7g79ldxuWitl2iGb8QxhyYka6bIjwT_CZu/s1600/Bauhaus+elevation.JPG" height="239" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
Sank behind the Iron Curtain, with Dessau hardly recovered from the last fighting of WW2, the Bauhaus was conveniently literally and metaphorically shot as a force for good forty years ago. Charles Jencks, the prophet of postmodernism, found it an easy target. Colin Rowe, in the process of forging his own academic career, rather meanly regarded Gropius as talentless.<br />
Now restored, it's actually very pretty. OK the main entrance space is cramped, and it's an object building that might be considered a bit block like, and the workshops never really worked and still don't, but there is something brilliant in those same workshops resembling car parks. Multi-story concrete car parks were a trilling new thing; they featured on postcards!<br />
You might see the same kind of design thinking in the Bauhaus as you do in a Tiger tank; some ruthless logic pursued to an end you'd better not mess with, it inspires respect. But trying to put my finger on it I realised there is one thing I'll agree with those postmodern critics about, because the Bauhaus complex could hardly be described as lyrical.<br />
Now lyrical might be another dangerous word not to be messed with, but that's immediately what I see if I compare the Bauhaus to another modern object building, The Pavilion Suisse by Le Corbusier of 1933. Here the entrance space is hardly some cramped echo of a brutish nineteenth century school, but an exercise in something else entirely, something that appears to do just about everything it can within a rigorous structural system as to bring comparison to poetry- stretching the bits, if you like, that are there to be stretched. Remember, place a marble on the floor as you come through the door, it rolls to the reception desk, to your left is the lift, all machinery exposed, ready to spin and clank, in front stands a strange collage on some kind of fin that shrouds a curving slice of staircase: actually a manifesto for L-C's whole way of thinking. The building anticipates, in these elements and more, not only the Unite d'habitation, but Ronchamp chapel, and in precedent, harks back to the acropolis, or if that is too ambitious for you, at least L-C's previous housing done for the Weissenhoff Seidlung of 1928; and ALL at the same time! No wonder L-C loved jazz.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgTUkKTsEuY6hpXy-1dZeDYdENxos2yzSN_CejAqNrFT61B3dU4ibuw_SLJV8ZDkziFSj_HzWXhwpn8uZFK4XuHb0UAFypNYnHkWb7uEOLeaLRB9jmf-3P5jddsA-9ivQjBk6ryxanGkxjd/s1600/Swiss+Pavilion-5.gif" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgTUkKTsEuY6hpXy-1dZeDYdENxos2yzSN_CejAqNrFT61B3dU4ibuw_SLJV8ZDkziFSj_HzWXhwpn8uZFK4XuHb0UAFypNYnHkWb7uEOLeaLRB9jmf-3P5jddsA-9ivQjBk6ryxanGkxjd/s1600/Swiss+Pavilion-5.gif" height="200" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />Paul Davieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05249946666409755091noreply@blogger.com0